Breaking the Walls: Open Ecosystems in Scientific Instrumentation

Share this article

Introduction: A Systemic Friction Point in Innovation

Scientific instrumentation is advancing rapidly in hardware capabilities. We’re seeing smarter, faster, and more sensitive systems emerge across domains like analytical chemistry, life sciences, and environmental monitoring. However, the ecosystem surrounding that hardware often lags behind. While the instruments themselves evolve, their ability to interact openly across platforms, vendors, and workflows remains deeply constrained.

Mass spectrometry (MS) provides a clear example. As one of the most powerful analytical tools available today, MS continues to lead in technological advancement. Yet the surrounding infrastructure remains siloed, with proprietary interfaces, closed software stacks, and integration barriers that reduce flexibility and scalability.

This post uses mass spectrometry to highlight a broader issue. The lack of open ecosystems in scientific instrumentation is not a technical limitation. It is a result of business strategy that limits progress.

The Fragmented World of Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometers have achieved remarkable capabilities. High-resolution analysis, flexible ionization, automation, and connected data workflows are now common. Despite these advances, pairing components across different platforms remains difficult.

Connecting an ambient ionization source, like DART or paper spray, often depends on compatibility with one brand of inlet. DART is tightly integrated into Bruker’s ecosystem. Paper spray ionization methods are primarily supported by Thermo Fisher platforms. DESI, originally developed by academia and commercialized via Prosolia, was once available in 4 or 5 different versions tailored to each vendor’s instrument interfaces, but is now owned by Waters and limited to their instruments. Acoustic droplet ejection systems such as Echo-MS are available exclusively for SCIEX platforms.

These are all valuable technologies great for their own applications tied to specific manufacturers. You want to try a new method or application?… you also want to buy a new mass spectrometer, right?

Common Friction Points:

  • Proprietary hardware interfaces: Non-standard mounting interface, electrical connection and interlock schemes
  • Software restrictions: Source control parameters limited to GUI, lacking scripting or remote access
  • Signal incompatibility: Variations in trigger formats, voltage levels, or protocols
  • Licensing limitations: Legal or firmware constraints on third-party integration

These constraints affect system developers, method developers, integrators, and researchers alike.

The Real Cost of Closed Ecosystems

The consequences of closed systems are more than inconvenience. They introduce inefficiency and restrict creativity.

1. Redundant Engineering Efforts

Integrators often need to design custom mounts, interfaces, and firmware just to combine samplers and analyzers. These tasks duplicate efforts across the industry.

2. Delayed Innovation

Ionization and sampling technologies frequently remain tied to one platform. Without broader compatibility, many ideas stall or never reach practical use.

3. Limited Options for Customers

Vertical product stacks restrict flexibility. If a system only works with specific samplers or software, users are unable to choose the best tools for their needs.

4. Slower Collaboration

Incompatibility reduces collaboration across labs and teams. A hardware team working on fluidics may be unable to integrate with another lab’s analyzer without extensive retrofitting.

Lessons from Other Industries

Many other industries once faced similar limitations. They addressed them by adopting open standards and modular approaches.

Industrial Automation: OPC-UA

OPC Unified Architecture (OPC-UA) enables devices in industrial control systems to communicate, regardless of vendor. Robots, sensors, and controllers exchange data and coordinate functions without requiring custom setups.

Laboratory Automation: SiLA

Standardization in Lab Automation (SiLA) provides a unified framework for laboratory device control. It supports integration with scheduling systems, LIMS, and ELNs.

Computing: USB and Ethernet

Universal standards like USB and Ethernet enable broad compatibility. Devices no longer require brand-specific interfaces to operate.

3D Printing: G-code and STL

Standardized geometry and command formats allow printers and software from different vendors to work together. This has supported widespread experimentation and rapid development.

A Modular Instrumentation Ecosystem

Scientific instrumentation can adopt similar principles. With shared standards and interoperability in mind, developers can create:

  • Standard mechanical and electrical interfaces for samplers, sources, and analyzers
  • Open APIs for source control, remote scripting, and method configuration
  • Common signal protocols for timing and synchronization
  • Open data formats for LIMS integration, analysis pipelines, and automation

These features support performance, reliability, and innovation across platforms.

ZEDion’s Role

At ZEDion, we work across systems to remove friction in development. We support OEMs, startups, and research labs with tools that are modular, scalable, and ready to integrate.

We help clients:

  • Design custom electromechanical adapters
  • Develop firmware and control protocols
  • Create embedded systems for timing and feedback
  • Integrate fluidic and sensing hardware with low dead volume
  • Transition prototypes to production with cross-platform support

We design with interoperability in mind. This reduces development time and extends the value of your innovation.

Looking Ahead

Open ecosystems support modularity. Modularity creates flexibility. Flexibility allows innovation, iteration, and speed. These are essential to progress.

Closed systems may appear stable, but they reduce momentum and slow collaboration. The scientific community benefits more from openness and shared progress.

To move forward, we can prioritize:

  • Open standards
  • Interoperable control systems
  • Cross-vendor integration
  • Accessible development tools

The future of instrumentation benefits from faster integration, more creative collaboration, and stronger connectivity.

Join the Conversation

If you’re developing a new system, facing compatibility issues, or planning for future flexibility, we’d like to help.

ZEDion works with teams that value flexibility and integration. Our engineering solutions support innovation from sample to signal.

Let’s connect.

#instrumentation #openeconomy #labautomation #massspectrometry #modularengineering #integrationstrategy #interoperability #scientificinstrumentation #ZEDion #fromsampletosignal

Picture of ZED<span style="color: #0c7cba;">ion</span> <small>a division of ZED Services LLC</small>

ZEDion a division of ZED Services LLC

At ZEDion, we offer comprehensive engineering and design services tailored to the automated analytical and life science instrumentation sectors. Our expertise ensures precision, innovation, and reliability in every project.

ZED Services LLC

ZED Services is a full-service mechanical engineering firm specializing in the design and development of precision automation, complex mechanical systems and specialized machines.

Recent Posts

Follow Us